CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Practice Exam

During a Risk Assessment, which type of paint is considered for evaluation?

1. Only new paint

2. All paint types

3. Deteriorated and intact paint on friction and impact surfaces

4. Only lead-based paint

The correct answer is: Deteriorated and intact paint on friction and impact surfaces

During a Risk Assessment, the evaluation is focused on deteriorated and intact paint on friction and impact surfaces because these conditions represent the most significant risk of lead exposure. Friction and impact surfaces, such as windows and doors, are areas where paint may wear down or chip easily, potentially releasing lead dust or particles into the environment. This makes them critical points for assessment. By examining both deteriorated and intact paint in these areas, assessors can determine the extent of lead hazards present. Deteriorated paint may pose immediate risks due to its potential to chip or create dust, while intact paint may still contain lead and could pose a risk if disturbed or damaged in the future. Considering only new paint would overlook the potential hazards posed by existing paint in older buildings, where lead-based paint was commonly used. Evaluating all paint types, while comprehensive, is not as targeted as focusing specifically on areas where lead exposure risks are highest. Lastly, only assessing lead-based paint would ignore the critical need to evaluate intact paint that may still contain lead. Therefore, focusing on the condition of paint on friction and impact surfaces provides a more accurate picture of potential risks related to lead exposure during the Risk Assessment.